Table of Contents
Main help menu
Close help
 
The Pirate

There's nothing about this subject related to being a pirate of any kind. I just thought there was something of a pirate look to the image and that's how I've come to think of it. And so, it's "The Pirate."

 

This is a tabblo story of what happens when an old time darkroom B&W print maker gets to play around with a digital image editor - without the comparable level of experience but with the same goal of a striking image.

 

I had this picture that I'd taken that had interesting qualities but on the whole there were flaws that needed to be corrected. The original picture was in color in a room with bright red walls. The red put a color cast into the image that could be corrected but even so, I thought the color was distracting.

Make it B&W.

But when the simple "desaturate" feature was used the resulting B&W image lost more than color saturation. It lost all vibrancy. All life.

 

A B&W conversion couldn't be that bad.

 

Not knowing the standard methods for converting to monochrome from color I went with what I knew. Get the basics of the B&W in the image. The color components in their original form - which are monochrome. Searching around I found the channels "tab" and created three separate B&W images made from the separated color components.

 

Though the blue channel looked pretty good (note that these show signs of manipulation - the vignetting - the originals are gone) it could still use some enhancing.  Looking at each color component I saw that I could grab parts from the other channels, where detail was lost or tones were better, and make a better overall image. That's what I did.

 

Using the selection tool I took the best of each component image, enhanced those parts and then merged them into the new "better" composite. That's the beauty of digital "layers." Pieces of a picture, layered on top of each other, with only the best showing through. Use the different image tools to remove the weaknesses in each of the parts and enhance the strengths. The primary tools I used were levels and curves which fine tune the contrast and tones.

 

But looking at the adjusted image I was still not happy with the pose. There was a bit of a slouch. Also the face seemed exaggeratedly broad. Since I knew I could grab pieces of the image I grabbed the face and moved it up - to counter the slouch. Not that difficult. The double Adam's apple wasn't even a problem since that's not unusual. I feathered, blurred and blended the image layers where ever the move looked apparent.

I noticed that the selection tool could be used to change the shape of a selection. Why not experiment with that feature? I selected the face again and using the "transform" feature I squeezed it to make it more narrow. Again, layer blending and blurring handled any edge effects. I also did the old "hand waving" method of darkening the sides of the face to give a more narrow look. Sorry but I never saved these intermediate stages. No images to show the changes other than the composite.

 

But enhancing can take different directions. Instead of removing the broadness of the face, why not use its implied strength and add toughness rather than tone it down? I was playing with the digital tools at this point so I can't say exactly what I did to create this version - The Coal Miner - mainly it was image sharpening on the skin areas of the face - to an extreme degree.

 

Here's a combined look at the original image and two B&W

directions.

 

Note: The top image has a further narrowing giving an almost gaunt look, with only the shoulders left broad.

COMMENTS
Anjad said at 3:55 a.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
Well done! Thanks for sharing.
Fredzee said at 4:14 a.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
a great lesson ! thanks
Floridamolle said at 6:59 a.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
A wonderful job and a great lesson in post processing. Thank you for sharing. one for my favorites
Jasontengco said at 8:48 a.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
Great tabblo!
Cruising said at 9:46 a.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
You did great work. I agree with you that the final product (your first image) is quite striking.
DVP said at 1:13 p.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
Very nice explanation of your PP techniques. Sometimes we learn more from 'playing' than anything else. Great image!
Fane77 said at 2:03 p.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
Thank you for the explanation. Great shot of the "pirate".
LatentE said at 2:32 p.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
Thanks for the encouraging comments.

I should correct some things in my tabblo commentary. I used words like feathering, blurring and blending to describe hiding the edges of selected areas that are moved or modified (stretched or squeezed). "Blur" was meant metaphorically more than literally. I rarely use the blur tool because the blurred smoothness is often as apparent if not quite as obvious as a sharp, out of place, edge. Mainly I use the rubber stamp tool with a less than full opacity level (50% or less) to copy some nearby area over the edge that's to be hidden. This can be a tedious process but if the area where the artificial edge is located is chosen correctly (say within a mass of hair) the process is fairly simple.

I often use the rubber stamp tool to eliminate things in an image that are distracting, such as the white plaster in the wall from picture holding nails that were removed. There's a newer tool called the "healing brush" that handles this sort of localized small fix-up more easily, but there are times when the healing brush doesn't work quite as intended.

Also I should mention that the way I converted from color to B&W is completely non-standard, likely not the best and certainly not the easiest. There are a few approaches to color to monochrome that can be found in tutorials on the web. The one I had found to be best is sometimes called the hue-saturation layer method.

Info on the hue-saturation method and others can be found at this site which I found by doing a quick google search.

http://www.blackandwhitedigital.com/Convert/compare.html
http://www.blackandwhitedigital.com/Convert/Manual/hue.html

The upcoming new version of Photoshop supposedly has improved handling of color to mono conversion but I haven't tried it so I can't say how good it is.

http://www.maclife.com/article/inside_photoshop_cs3?page=0%2C10

The hue-saturation method allows viewing how the output B&W image looks through a continuously variable color filter. Instead of only seeing how it would look through pure red, green and blue filters, you can see the effects of an orange or violet filter, etc.

But the idea of doing a bit of extra work and seeing the effects of different filters on different parts of an image and then bringing the best enhancements of each of those parts through to a final image would be the same. One part of a picture might convert to B&W better with an orange filter and another with a blue filter so why limit the enhancing filter color to one choice, even if that choice is over a wider range?
Pkeener said at 4:04 p.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
Oh Wow. I ned to read this a few more times. I do understand the impact of using filters for Black and white...this is a great lesson! Thank you! The enhanced image is far more interesting than the color shot.
Geddon22 said at 4:44 p.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
So cool!
Mittens said at 5:56 p.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
Whatever you did, you got great results!!! It sounds like you spent a good amount of time working on this picture and the difference is amazing. Super job!
Mthorne said at 9:57 p.m. on Mar 29, 2007:
very impressive and an interesting subject.
Whya said at 3:27 p.m. on Mar 30, 2007:
great shot and great tutorial, thanks!
Zippywinds said at 8:17 p.m. on Mar 30, 2007:
oh thanks for this outstanding tutorial, great portrait pic :)
Karsten said at 11:31 a.m. on Mar 31, 2007:
Thank you very much for this very interesting lesson!!! Great end-result and i like it how you describe the process!!! Do you know the german middle-age painter Albrecht Duerer? He made a selfportait - that was the first thing that came to mi mind when i saw your foto...Great Job!!! Definifly a fav!!!
LatentE said at 3:37 p.m. on Mar 31, 2007:
Thanks for the kinds words Karsten (and others previously). I hadn't known about Albrecht Duerer but on checking google I can see what you referred to.

http://www.abcgallery.com/D/durer/durer26.html

Actually, other than a pirate the image reminds me of a blogger with an unusual persona, Jesus' General.

http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/

I think the icon is based on a character in an animated movie but I can't find the specifics at the moment.

Looking at the wisps of hair pulled over the cheeks I think I remember his girl friend doing that just before I began photographing him. That's probably the basis for the perfect curls and feminine quality to the hair.
Tigercub said at 4:05 p.m. on Mar 31, 2007:
very picturesque man. makes me want to draw him. red background is ok, but could be just a bit darker red, more like burgundi. anyway, b&w image is great. thanks.
Siagian said at 9:38 p.m. on Mar 31, 2007:
superb portraiture. what do you think of "The Gypsy"? i think he is exudes not only strength, but also mystery and romanticism. great tutorial too, makes me wish i had photoshop!!!
LatentE said at 10:04 p.m. on Mar 31, 2007:
"The Gypsy?" Sure. A rebel. How about Harley riding rock musician?

"The Gimp" is a powerful open source image editor, though being open source it doesn't have the best interface and support. I recently saw a mention of "Gimpshop" which supposedly makes the interface for Gimp a little easier to use.
Ejmccartin said at 12:11 p.m. on Apr 2, 2007:
fabulous! thanks for the tutorial!
Tootie said at 5:42 a.m. on Apr 6, 2007:
You have some Great images!



Check out this new web site

http://www.picpublisher.com/referral/Bev_Turner
EMA said at 6:12 p.m. on Apr 11, 2007:
Great job!
StacyCK said at 5:38 p.m. on Apr 20, 2007:
I love the picture and the editing. Great tutorial! I have some actions that I use in CS2 and they all give a different effect. Occassionally, I do it manually, too. There are so many ways to convert a color to black and white.
Hyhoa said at 5:02 a.m. on May 3, 2007:
I can't understand all the sublety of your technical explanations beeing not an experienced photographer but this portrait is really powerfull and show a deep personnality inside perfect for a painting study .My best is the first one Thanks for sharing and all your explanation
JoanW said at 10:54 a.m. on May 14, 2007:
What a great teaching tabblo. It's very interesting to see all the steps you used to create your final composition. It's quite amazing what some post processing work can do. I think it is so helpful when people share their experience in such a way. Thanks so much.
Alex_regio said at 1:18 a.m. on Jun 14, 2007:
Thanks for sharing the tips and the great lesson, do you know any other tabblos that shares lessons as youu do.? Thanks
LatentE said at 7:41 a.m. on Jun 14, 2007:
This tabblo was placed in Floridamolle's "Photo Knowledge Share Group" where you can find other image making tips. Also in the discussion at the bottom of that group Cruising points out that there are other image making help groups at Tabblo. On the web doing a Google search on 'Photoshop tutorials' gives links to photo help sites. Some of the help sites have video tutorials.
Paolo said at 3:41 a.m. on Jul 13, 2007:
Great work! Thanks for your explanations.
Sophieyo said at 5:44 p.m. on Jul 13, 2007:
thanks for your pedagogy !
Photosfornow said at 7:37 p.m. on Jul 13, 2007:
Thank you for the information and lessons, this is a lot for me to take in at one sitting. Will there be a pop quiz coming soon? If so I need to study for it...
LatentE said at 8:16 p.m. on Jul 13, 2007:
If there was a lesson here it was one of discovery. Certainly not 'follow the steps' since some of what I did here was not the easiest or best method.
Eduardo.affonso said at 8:00 p.m. on Jul 16, 2007:
Thanks for the lesson! I've read it again and again, and your text is as interesting as the photos themselves.
Alisande21 said at 8:56 a.m. on Jul 17, 2007:
Wow. For not being an "expert" as you claim, you kick butt. :)
Engelgrafik said at 11:23 a.m. on Jul 17, 2007:
Looks awesome, only I would have left the detail in the face. It's a bit too soft for a man if you ask me. I wanna see grit and creases. You've pretty much captured the Polaroid Type 55 high-res negative quality here... but you're missing that detail in the face. That's the only thing.
Nmat said at 11:17 p.m. on Jul 17, 2007:
Great tutorial, and terrific tabblo idea. Thanks for the lessons, and for all your enjoyable and informative commentary.
Trix said at 10:00 a.m. on Jul 21, 2007:
You DO look like a pirate!!!!!
Pkeener said at 11:05 a.m. on Oct 18, 2007:
forgot about this one..so, i guess i have seen yr face.
LatentE said at 11:47 a.m. on Oct 18, 2007:
This is not a self portrait. That would take more digital enhancement than I have the skills for.
Swedfinn said at 1:56 p.m. on Sep 26, 2008:
Interesting lesson and results! I got some new ideas to experiment with.Thanks for sharing!
Wildthing said at 6:51 p.m. on Nov 11, 2008:
Proves that seeing is not believing. Manipulation rules, and there is obviously nothing wrong with enhancing an image. Nice work.
Add a comment
Flag this tabblo as "may offend"